On Tue, Oct 07, 2025 at 03:06:21PM +0200, Eugenio Pérez wrote:
> An userland device implemented through VDUSE could take rtnl forever if
> the virtio-net driver is running on top of virtio_vdpa.  Let's break the
> device if it does not return the buffer in a longer-than-assumible
> timeout.

So now I can't debug qemu with gdb because guest dies :(
Let's not break valid use-cases please.


Instead, solve it in vduse, probably by handling cvq within
kernel.


> A less agressive path can be taken to recover the device, like only
> resetting the control virtqueue.  However, the state of the device after
> this action is taken races, as the vq could be reset after the device
> writes the OK.  Leaving TODO anyway.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eugenio Pérez <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index 31bd32bdecaf..ed68ad69a019 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -3576,6 +3576,7 @@ static bool virtnet_send_command_reply(struct 
> virtnet_info *vi, u8 class, u8 cmd
>  {
>       struct scatterlist *sgs[5], hdr, stat;
>       u32 out_num = 0, tmp, in_num = 0;
> +     unsigned long end_time;
>       bool ok;
>       int ret;
>  
> @@ -3614,11 +3615,20 @@ static bool virtnet_send_command_reply(struct 
> virtnet_info *vi, u8 class, u8 cmd
>  
>       /* Spin for a response, the kick causes an ioport write, trapping
>        * into the hypervisor, so the request should be handled immediately.
> +      *
> +      * Long timeout so a malicious device is not able to lock rtnl forever.
>        */
> +     end_time = jiffies + 30 * HZ;
>       while (!virtqueue_get_buf(vi->cvq, &tmp) &&
>              !virtqueue_is_broken(vi->cvq)) {
>               cond_resched();
>               cpu_relax();
> +
> +             if (time_after(end_time, jiffies)) {
> +                     /* TODO Reset vq if possible? */
> +                     virtio_break_device(vi->vdev);
> +                     break;
> +             }
>       }
>  
>  unlock:
> -- 
> 2.51.0


Reply via email to