On 9/29/2025 5:34 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 02:20:54PM +0800, Jingyi Wang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 9/25/2025 9:48 AM, Krzysztof Kozłowski wrote:
>>> On Thu, 25 Sept 2025 at 08:37, Jingyi Wang <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Add remote processor PAS loader for Kaanapali CDSP processor, compatible
>>>> with earlier SM8550 with minor difference: one more sixth "shutdown-ack"
>>>> interrupt.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang <[email protected]>
>>>> ---
>>>> .../bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8550-pas.yaml | 19
>>>> +++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git
>>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8550-pas.yaml
>>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8550-pas.yaml
>>>> index be9e2a0bc060..031fdf36a66c 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8550-pas.yaml
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8550-pas.yaml
>>>> @@ -35,6 +35,9 @@ properties:
>>>> - items:
>>>> - const: qcom,sm8750-cdsp-pas
>>>> - const: qcom,sm8650-cdsp-pas
>>>> + - items:
>>>> + - const: qcom,kaanapali-cdsp-pas
>>>> + - const: qcom,sm8550-cdsp-pas
>>>
>>>
>>> This time maybe without HTML:
>>>
>>> This looks wrong. This is not compatible with SM8550.
>>
>> Could you point out what is the difference from your perspecetive?
>> it is the same as SM8550 except for there is one more interrupt,
>> which is also described in this patch.
>
> I'd second Krzysztof here. Your description points out that it is _not_
> compatible to SM8550.
>
Here is the binding for sm8750 cdsp. Fallback to sm8650 but describe the
difference in interrupt:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
Thanks,
Jingyi
