On 9/30/2025 10:16 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 10:12:27AM +0800, Jingyi Wang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 9/29/2025 8:22 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 06:11:23PM +0800, Jingyi Wang wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 9/29/2025 5:39 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 02:06:11PM +0800, Jingyi Wang wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9/25/2025 10:19 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 04:37:22PM -0700, Jingyi Wang wrote:
>>>>>>>> Document compatible for Qualcomm Kaanapali SoC ADSP PAS which looks
>>>>>>>> fully
>>>>>>>> compatible with SM8750, which can fallback to SM8550 except for one
>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>> interrupt ("shutdown-ack").
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8550-pas.yaml | 6
>>>>>>>> +++++-
>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> diff --git
>>>>>>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8550-pas.yaml
>>>>>>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8550-pas.yaml
>>>>>>>> index 2dd479cf4821..be9e2a0bc060 100644
>>>>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8550-pas.yaml
>>>>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8550-pas.yaml
>>>>>>>> @@ -28,7 +28,9 @@ properties:
>>>>>>>> - qcom,x1e80100-adsp-pas
>>>>>>>> - qcom,x1e80100-cdsp-pas
>>>>>>>> - items:
>>>>>>>> - - const: qcom,sm8750-adsp-pas
>>>>>>>> + - enum:
>>>>>>>> + - qcom,kaanapali-adsp-pas
>>>>>>>> + - qcom,sm8750-adsp-pas
>>>>>>>> - const: qcom,sm8550-adsp-pas
>>>>>>>> - items:
>>>>>>>> - const: qcom,sm8750-cdsp-pas
>>>>>>>> @@ -95,6 +97,7 @@ allOf:
>>>>>>>> compatible:
>>>>>>>> contains:
>>>>>>>> enum:
>>>>>>>> + - qcom,kaanapali-adsp-pas
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This one and the next entry are redundant. Do you see why?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This one describe the interrupt:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - if:
>>>>>> properties:
>>>>>> compatible:
>>>>>> contains:
>>>>>
>>>>>> enum:
>>>>>> - qcom,kaanapali-adsp-pas
>>>>>> - qcom,sm8750-adsp-pas
>>>>>
>>>>> It's still redundant. Don't you see it?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> sorry I didn't get your point here, could you explain more?
>>>
>>> For you device you have two compat strings, kaanapali and sm8750. This
>>> schema block is covered by 'if compat contains sm8750', so you don't
>>> need to add kaanapali to the if-case. You already hit this check thanks
>>> to the fallback compat.
>>>
>>
>> Hi Dimitry,
>>
>> our device contains sm8550, not sm8750.
>
> I should be reading the patches more carefully. I beg your pardon,
> indeed, you were right.
>
No worries at all, appreciate for your review and clarification.
Thanks,
Jingyi
