On 2025-09-19 17:34:09+0200, Benjamin Berg wrote: > From: Benjamin Berg <[email protected]> > > This patchset is an attempt to start a nolibc port of UML. The goal is > to port UML to use nolibc in smaller chunks to make the switch more > manageable. > > There are three parts to this patchset: > * Two patches to use tools/include headers instead of kernel headers > for userspace files. > * A few nolibc fixes and a new NOLIBC_NO_STARTCODE compile flag for it > * Finally nolibc build support for UML and switching two files while > adding the appropriate support in nolibc itself. > > v1 of this patchset was > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ > > Changes in v2: > - add sys/uio.h and sys/ptrace.h to nolibc > - Use NOLIBC_NO_RUNTIME to disable nolibc startup code > - Fix out-of-tree build > - various small improvements and cleanups > > Should the nolibc changes be merged separately or could everything go > through the same branch?
Both work for me. But only for the next cycle. > Also, what about tools/include/linux/compiler.h? It seems that was added > for the tracing code, but it is not clear to me who might ACK that fix. Some files in tools/ are orphaned. In the past I got some reviews, included the change in my tree and mentioned it to Linus in my regular pull request. (...) Thomas
