On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 5:02 AM Peng Fan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Simplify clock enable
> > logic using dcfg flags
> > > +       /* Remote core is under control of Linux or clock is not
> > > + managed by firmware */
> >
> > I see that you negate the comment from imx_rproc_clk_enable but
> > with the negation OR becomes AND.
> >
> > So, the comment should be:
> >
> > /* Handle clocks when remote core is under control of Linux AND the
> > clocks are not managed by remote side  FW */
>
> I thought this flag is clear that clk should be managed by driver.
> I will update the comment.
>
> >
> > Also, do we really need this flag?
> > Shouldn't we just make a decision based on the fact that clk is in the
> > device tree or not?
>
> From hardware perspective, there is always clk for the remote cores.
> So DT describe hardware, a clk property should be there.
>
> But NXP system firmware manages the CLK automatically, no need
> driver to do that.  So this flag is required here.


OK, makes sense. Thanks. With comment changed you can add my

Reviewed-by: Daniel Baluta <[email protected]>


thanks,
Daniel.

Reply via email to