On Wed, 3 Sept 2025 at 01:20, Daniel Baluta <[email protected]> wrote: > > <snip> > > > >Please give detailed suggestions, but not a general comment. > > > > > > @Daniel, @Frank — since you've reviewed and R-b'd this patchset, do you > > have thoughts on the latest feedback from Mathieu? Would you agree that > > further simplification is needed, or is the current structure acceptable?” > > Peng, please trim the message when replying so that you keep only > relevant part of the text. > > I think you are both right here. I understand your frustration :) > but also Mathieu's point of view is reasonable. > > For a person who doesn't know the internals of IMX remoteproc the code > is a little > bit hard to understand. Peng I've given you my R-b because even if the > feels like > it is getting complicated it is still manageable and you are the > maintainer for it. > > Allow me a few days to see if we can simplify the logic. >
Excellent. > thanks, > Daniel.
