<snip>

> >Please give detailed suggestions, but not a general comment.
>
>
> @Daniel, @Frank — since you've reviewed and R-b'd this patchset, do you
> have thoughts on the latest feedback from Mathieu? Would you agree that
> further simplification is needed, or is the current structure acceptable?”

Peng, please trim the message when replying so that you keep only
relevant part of the text.

I think you are both right here. I understand your frustration :)
but also Mathieu's point of view is reasonable.

For a person who doesn't know the internals of IMX remoteproc the code
is a little
bit hard to understand. Peng I've given you my R-b because even if the
feels like
it is getting complicated it is still manageable and you are the
maintainer for it.

Allow me a few days to see if we can simplify the logic.

thanks,
Daniel.

Reply via email to