Sagi Shahar wrote:
[snip]
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/processor.c
> b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/processor.c
> index b2a4b11ac8c0..1eae92957456 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/processor.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/processor.c
> @@ -687,12 +687,9 @@ void vcpu_arch_set_entry_point(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> void *guest_code)
> vcpu_regs_set(vcpu, ®s);
> }
>
> -struct kvm_vcpu *vm_arch_vcpu_add(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpu_id)
> +vm_vaddr_t kvm_allocate_vcpu_stack(struct kvm_vm *vm)
> {
> - struct kvm_mp_state mp_state;
> - struct kvm_regs regs;
> vm_vaddr_t stack_vaddr;
> - struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
>
> stack_vaddr = __vm_vaddr_alloc(vm, DEFAULT_STACK_PGS * getpagesize(),
> DEFAULT_GUEST_STACK_VADDR_MIN,
> @@ -713,6 +710,15 @@ struct kvm_vcpu *vm_arch_vcpu_add(struct kvm_vm *vm,
> uint32_t vcpu_id)
> "__vm_vaddr_alloc() did not provide a page-aligned
> address");
> stack_vaddr -= 8;
>
> + return stack_vaddr;
> +}
> +
> +struct kvm_vcpu *vm_arch_vcpu_add(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpu_id)
> +{
> + struct kvm_mp_state mp_state;
> + struct kvm_regs regs;
> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> +
> vcpu = __vm_vcpu_add(vm, vcpu_id);
> vcpu_init_cpuid(vcpu, kvm_get_supported_cpuid());
> vcpu_init_sregs(vm, vcpu);
> @@ -721,7 +727,8 @@ struct kvm_vcpu *vm_arch_vcpu_add(struct kvm_vm *vm,
> uint32_t vcpu_id)
> /* Setup guest general purpose registers */
> vcpu_regs_get(vcpu, ®s);
> regs.rflags = regs.rflags | 0x2;
> - regs.rsp = stack_vaddr;
> + if (vm->type != KVM_X86_TDX_VM)
> + regs.rsp = kvm_allocate_vcpu_stack(vm);
At this point in the series vm->type can't be KVM_X86_TDX_VM correct?
So that makes this safe during bisect?
Ira
> vcpu_regs_set(vcpu, ®s);
>
> /* Setup the MP state */
> --
> 2.51.0.rc1.193.gad69d77794-goog
>