On 02/01, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > hrtimer_nanosleep: > > > > /* Absolute timers do not update the rmtp value and restart: */ > > return -ERESTARTNOHAND; > > > > This is not right, -ERESTARTNOHAND means we will do restart if there is no > > in fact pending signal, and worse, this restart will use the same unchanged > > "__user *rmtp" parameter. > > -ERESTARTNOHAND is safe here. We want to restart the timer.
Ah. I was greatly confused by the comment, it says "do not ... restart", now I understand what this _actually_ means. And yes, I was wrong. If restart is wanted, it is safe to use the original *rqtp, the timer is HRTIMER_MODE_ABS. Thanks Thomas! Andrew, please ignore this patch. Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
