>> In that case, it's pretty much a random number (of a random page used
>> as a leave page table) and does not let g1 identify locations of
>> symbols etc. If so, I don't think this is a "clear security issue"
>> and suggest squashing this into the actual fix (#p4 I assume).
> 
> yeah __maybe__ I overstated the importance ;)
> 
> But I would still like to keep it as a separate patch, looks more
> straightforward to me
>  

I don't see a need to split this up. Just fix it right away.


-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb

Reply via email to