On 6/22/2020 2:49 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 07:04:09AM -0700, [email protected] wrote: ...+static void intel_pmu_arch_lbr_read_xsave(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc) +{ + struct x86_perf_task_context_arch_lbr_xsave *xsave = cpuc->lbr_xsave; + struct arch_lbr_entry *lbr; + int i; + + if (!xsave) + goto rollback;Why not make it simplier? if (!xsave) { intel_pmu_arch_lbr_read(cpuc); return; } The goto and "return" statement before the "rollback" label looks pretty ugly. I'm sorry I didn't follow the series in details so if you plan to add more handlers at "rollback" then sure.
There were several handlers when I first implemented the function, but they are removed now. I don't think I will add more handlers in the next version.
I will remove the "rollback" label. Thanks for pointing it out. Kan

