On Wed, 2019-08-21 at 09:13 -0400, Siarhei Liakh wrote:
> If mm_cpumask() is not safe, then at the very least the following has
> to be fixed:
> $ grep -rIn 'cpumask_clear(mm_cpumask(' *
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/tlb.h:69: cpumask_clear(mm_cpumask(mm));
> arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c:857: cpumask_clear(mm_cpumask(mm));
> arch/ia64/include/asm/mmu_context.h:92: cpumask_clear(mm_cpuma
> sk(mm));
> arch/csky/mm/asid.c:126: cpumask_clear(mm_cpumask(mm));
> arch/arm/mm/context.c:233: cpumask_clear(mm_cpumask(mm));
>
> Otherwise, mm_init_cpumask() can be simplified down to
> cpumask_clear(mm_cpumask(mm)).
> What do you think?That looks like a nice cleanup. I do not see why it would not work, but I suppose that should be tested :) -- All Rights Reversed.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
