On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 05:14:41PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 11:33:49PM +0200, Remi Pommarel wrote:
> > PCI_EXP_RTCTL is used to activate PME interrupt only, so writing into it
> > should not modify other interrupts' mask (such as ISR0).
> > 
> > Fixes: 6302bf3ef78d ("PCI: Init PCIe feature bits for managed host bridge 
> > alloc")
> > Signed-off-by: Remi Pommarel <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > Please note that I will unlikely be able to answer any comments from May
> > 24th to June 10th.
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/controller/pci-aardvark.c | 10 +++++++---
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-aardvark.c 
> > b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-aardvark.c
> > index 134e0306ff00..27102d3b4f9c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-aardvark.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-aardvark.c
> > @@ -451,10 +451,14 @@ advk_pci_bridge_emul_pcie_conf_write(struct 
> > pci_bridge_emul *bridge,
> >             advk_writel(pcie, new, PCIE_CORE_PCIEXP_CAP + reg);
> >             break;
> >  
> > -   case PCI_EXP_RTCTL:
> > -           new = (new & PCI_EXP_RTCTL_PMEIE) << 3;
> > -           advk_writel(pcie, new, PCIE_ISR0_MASK_REG);
> > +   case PCI_EXP_RTCTL: {
> > +           /* Only mask/unmask PME interrupt */
> > +           u32 val = advk_readl(pcie, PCIE_ISR0_MASK_REG) &
> > +                   ~PCIE_MSG_PM_PME_MASK;
> > +           val |= (new & PCI_EXP_RTCTL_PMEIE) << 3;
> 
> I know you have not introduced this code but maybe we can
> take an opportunity to clarify it (that << 3 shift obfuscates
> a bit):
> 
>       u32 val = advk_readl(pcie, PCIE_ISR0_MASK_REG) &
>                       ~PCIE_MSG_PM_PME_MASK;
> 
>       if (new & PCI_EXP_RTCTL_PMEIE)
>               val |= PCIE_MSG_PM_PME_MASK;
> 
>       advk_writel(pcie, val, PCIE_ISR0_MASK_REG);
>       break;
> 
> Or I am not reading the code correctly ?

Sure, that clarifies the code at the point where I realize that the
"<< 3" from the original code was off by one and the mask polarity was
inverted. So I'll fix all that in the v2.

Thanks.

-- 
Remi

Reply via email to