On Wed, 2019-06-12 at 14:25 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the
> return value.  The function can work or not, but the code logic should
> never do something different based on this.
> 

Thanks Greg.

Reviewed-by: Sudeep Dutt <[email protected]>

> Cc: Sudeep Dutt <[email protected]>
> Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <[email protected]>
> Cc: Dan Williams <[email protected]>
> Cc: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/dma/mic_x100_dma.c | 6 ++----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/mic_x100_dma.c b/drivers/dma/mic_x100_dma.c
> index 6a91e28d537d..584e09661507 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/mic_x100_dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/mic_x100_dma.c
> @@ -728,10 +728,8 @@ static int mic_dma_driver_probe(struct mbus_device 
> *mbdev)
>       if (mic_dma_dbg) {
>               mic_dma_dev->dbg_dir = debugfs_create_dir(dev_name(&mbdev->dev),
>                                                         mic_dma_dbg);
> -             if (mic_dma_dev->dbg_dir)
> -                     debugfs_create_file("mic_dma_reg", 0444,
> -                                         mic_dma_dev->dbg_dir, mic_dma_dev,
> -                                         &mic_dma_reg_fops);
> +             debugfs_create_file("mic_dma_reg", 0444, mic_dma_dev->dbg_dir,
> +                                 mic_dma_dev, &mic_dma_reg_fops);
>       }
>       return 0;
>  }


Reply via email to