On 4/27/19 12:28 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 05:47:09PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-7):

commit: 345c0dbf3a30872d9b204db96b5857cd00808cae ("ext4: protect journal inode's 
blocks using block_validity")
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4.git dev

in testcase: xfstests
with following parameters:

        disk: 4HDD
        fs: ext4
        test: ext4-run
Hi, I'm not able to reproduce this.


Thanks for your input, we found the test result of ext4/303 is not stable on this commit, but it's no problem on v5.1-rc7.



TESTRUNID: tytso-20190426093752
KERNEL:    kernel 5.1.0-rc3-xfstests-00007-g345c0dbf3a30 #921 SMP Fri Apr 26 
09:36:55 EDT 2019 x86_64
CMDLINE:   -c 4k -g auto
CPUS:      2
MEM:       7680

ext4/4k: 462 tests, 43 skipped, 4271 seconds
Totals: 419 tests, 43 skipped, 0 failures, 0 errors, 4249s

Ran: ext4/001 ext4/002 ext4/003 ext4/004 ext4/005 ext4/020 ext4/021 ext4/022 
ext4/023 ext4/024 ext4/025 ext4/026 ext4/027 ext4/028 ext4/029 ext4/030 
ext4/031 ext4/032 ext4/033 ext4/034 ext4/271 ext4/301 ext4/302 ext4/303 
ext4/305 ext4/306 ext4/307 ext4/308 generic/001 generic/002 generic/003 ....

Given some of the failures, especially this one:


Yes, it's our fault, we have fixed it.

Best Regards,
Rong Chen



ext4/307        - output mismatch (see 
/lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//ext4/307.out.bad)
     --- tests/ext4/307.out     2019-04-25 09:04:55.000000000 +0800
     +++ /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//ext4/307.out.bad     2019-04-26 
13:15:02.522490198 +0800
     @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
      QA output created by 307
Run fsstress
     +./tests/ext4/307: line 34: gawk: command not found
      Allocate donor file
      Perform compacting
      Check data
     ...
     (Run 'diff -u /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/tests/ext4/307.out 
/lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//ext4/307.out.bad'  to see the entire diff)
I'm very much wondering whether your VM has gotten corrupted or hasn't
been correctly set up?

                                        - Ted

Reply via email to