> 
> Hearing no objections, here is the updated patch.
> 
>                                                               Thanx, Paul
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> commit 970cab5d3d206029ed27274a98ea1c3d7e780e53
> Author: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
> Date:   Mon Oct 29 07:36:50 2018 -0700
> 
>     rcu: Avoid signed integer overflow in rcu_preempt_deferred_qs()
> 
>     Subtracting INT_MIN can be interpreted as unconditional signed integer
>     overflow, which according to the C standard is undefined behavior.
>     Therefore, kernel build arguments notwithstanding, it would be good to
>     future-proof the code.  This commit therefore substitutes INT_MAX for
>     INT_MIN in order to avoid undefined behavior.
> 
>     While in the neighborhood, this commit also creates some meaningful
> names
>     for INT_MAX and friends in order to improve readability, as suggested
>     by Joel Fernandes.
> 
>     Reported-by: Ran Rozenstein <[email protected]>
>     Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
> 
>     squash! rcu: Avoid signed integer overflow in rcu_preempt_deferred_qs()
> 
>     While in the neighborhood, use macros to give meaningful names.
> 
>     Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
> 


Hi,

What is the acceptance status of this patch?

Thanks,
Ran

Reply via email to