Hi Boris,

Boris Brezillon <[email protected]> wrote on Thu, 26 Jul 2018
21:06:55 +0200:

> On Sun, 22 Jul 2018 08:44:32 +0200
> Boris Brezillon <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 17:15:19 +0200
> > Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> wrote:
> >   
> > > Two helpers have been added to the core to make ECC-related
> > > configuration between the detection phase and the final NAND scan. Use
> > > these hooks and convert the driver to just use nand_scan_with_ids()
> > > (alternative to nand_scan() for passing a flash IDs table) instead of
> > > both nand_scan_ident() and nand_scan_tail().
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]>    
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <[email protected]>
> >   
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sm_common.c | 39 
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > >  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sm_common.c 
> > > b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sm_common.c
> > > index 7f5044a79f01..d05e3f976a5e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sm_common.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sm_common.c
> > > @@ -160,19 +160,9 @@ static struct nand_flash_dev nand_xd_flash_ids[] = {
> > >   {NULL}
> > >  };
> > >  
> > > -int sm_register_device(struct mtd_info *mtd, int smartmedia)
> > > +static int sm_attach_chip(struct nand_chip *chip)
> > >  {
> > > - struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
> > > - int ret;
> > > -
> > > - chip->options |= NAND_SKIP_BBTSCAN;
> > > -
> > > - /* Scan for card properties */
> > > - ret = nand_scan_ident(mtd, 1, smartmedia ?
> > > -         nand_smartmedia_flash_ids : nand_xd_flash_ids);
> > > -
> > > - if (ret)
> > > -         return ret;
> > > + struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
> > >  
> > >   /* Bad block marker position */
> > >   chip->badblockpos = 0x05;
> > > @@ -187,12 +177,33 @@ int sm_register_device(struct mtd_info *mtd, int 
> > > smartmedia)
> > >   else
> > >           return -ENODEV;
> > >  
> > > - ret = nand_scan_tail(mtd);
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > >  
> > > +static const struct nand_controller_ops sm_controller_ops = {
> > > + .attach_chip = sm_attach_chip,
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +int sm_register_device(struct mtd_info *mtd, int smartmedia)
> > > +{
> > > + struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
> > > + struct nand_flash_dev *flash_ids;
> > > + int ret;
> > > +
> > > + chip->options |= NAND_SKIP_BBTSCAN;
> > > +
> > > + /* Scan for card properties */
> > > + chip->dummy_controller.ops = &sm_controller_ops;
> > > + flash_ids = smartmedia ? nand_smartmedia_flash_ids : nand_xd_flash_ids;
> > > + ret = nand_scan_with_ids(mtd, 1, flash_ids);
> > >   if (ret)
> > >           return ret;
> > >  
> > > - return mtd_device_register(mtd, NULL, 0);
> > > + ret = mtd_device_register(mtd, NULL, 0);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > +         nand_release(mtd);  
> 
> Didn't notice that while reviewing, but it would have been better to
> use nand_cleanup() and do this change separately.

Indeed, will fix it.

Miquèl

Reply via email to