On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 10:09:27AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> @@ -496,14 +496,14 @@ void mem_cgroup_print_oom_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>  
>  static inline void mem_cgroup_oom_enable(void)
>  {
> -     WARN_ON(current->memcg_may_oom);
> -     current->memcg_may_oom = 1;
> +     WARN_ON(current->in_user_fault);
> +     current->in_user_fault = 1;
>  }
>  
>  static inline void mem_cgroup_oom_disable(void)
>  {
> -     WARN_ON(!current->memcg_may_oom);
> -     current->memcg_may_oom = 0;
> +     WARN_ON(!current->in_user_fault);
> +     current->in_user_fault = 0;
>  }

Would it make more sense to rename these to
mem_cgroup_enter_user_fault(), mem_cgroup_exit_user_fault()?

Other than that, this looks great to me.

Thanks

Reply via email to