On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 5:29 AM, Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> wrote:
> Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 16:47:10 -0700
>> Kees Cook <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
>>> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
>>> to pass the timer pointer explicitly.
>>>
>>> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: [email protected]
>>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
>>
>> Looks fine to me. Is this intended to be merged via the powerpc tree
>> in the next merge window?
>
> It relies on the new timer_setup(), which is in one of tglx's trees (I
> think). So I expect it to go via that tree.

It's in -rc3, but the timer tree can carry it if you want. Which do you prefer?

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security

Reply via email to