3.16.46-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>

commit f2200ac311302fcdca6556fd0c5127eab6c65a3e upstream.

When the perf_branch_entry::{in_tx,abort,cycles} fields were added,
intel_pmu_lbr_read_32() wasn't updated to initialize them.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Fixes: 135c5612c460 ("perf/x86/intel: Support Haswell/v4 LBR format")
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
[bwh: Backported to 3.16:
 - There's no perf_branch_entry::cycles field
 - Adjust filename]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <[email protected]>
---
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
@@ -268,6 +268,8 @@ static void intel_pmu_lbr_read_32(struct
                cpuc->lbr_entries[i].to         = msr_lastbranch.to;
                cpuc->lbr_entries[i].mispred    = 0;
                cpuc->lbr_entries[i].predicted  = 0;
+               cpuc->lbr_entries[i].in_tx      = 0;
+               cpuc->lbr_entries[i].abort      = 0;
                cpuc->lbr_entries[i].reserved   = 0;
        }
        cpuc->lbr_stack.nr = i;

Reply via email to