On Monday, March 20, 2017 11:38:15 AM Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 10:24:24PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > Honestly, if the processor had been capable of doing per-core P-states, that > > would have been a disaster and there are customers who wouldn't look at > > schedutil again after being confronted with these numbers. > > This, I feel, is a bit overstated.
Maybe a bit, but I'm not really sure ... > We have bug, we fix them. Of course. :-)
