The length is now passed by reference, so the assertion has to be updated
to match the other changes, as pointed out by this W=1 warning:

fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c: In function 'xfs_extent_busy_trim':
fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c:356:13: error: ordered comparison of pointer with 
integer zero [-Werror=extra]

Fixes: ebf55872616c ("xfs: improve handling of busy extents in the low-level 
allocator")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c
index ab062610234e..77760dbf0242 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c
@@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ xfs_extent_busy_trim(
        struct rb_node          *rbp;
        bool                    ret = false;
 
-       ASSERT(len > 0);
+       ASSERT(*len > 0);
 
        spin_lock(&args->pag->pagb_lock);
 restart:
-- 
2.9.0

Reply via email to