On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 17:10:28 +0100 Catalin Marinas <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 11:51:41PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > > FYI, we noticed the following commit: > > > > https://github.com/0day-ci/linux > > Catalin-Marinas/mm-kmemleak-Avoid-using-__va-on-addresses-that-don-t-have-a-lowmem-mapping/20160816-232733 > > commit 122708b1b91eb3d253baf86a263ead0f1f5cac78 ("mm: kmemleak: Avoid using > > __va() on addresses that don't have a lowmem mapping") > > > > in testcase: boot > > > > on test machine: 1 threads qemu-system-i386 -enable-kvm with 320M memory > > > > caused below changes: > > > > +--------------------------------+------------+------------+ > > | | 304bec1b1d | 122708b1b9 | > > +--------------------------------+------------+------------+ > > | boot_successes | 3 | 0 | > > | boot_failures | 5 | 8 | > > | invoked_oom-killer:gfp_mask=0x | 1 | | > > | Mem-Info | 1 | | > > | BUG:kernel_test_crashed | 4 | | > > | PANIC:early_exception | 0 | 8 | > > | EIP_is_at__phys_addr | 0 | 8 | > > | BUG:kernel_hang_in_boot_stage | 0 | 2 | > > | BUG:kernel_boot_hang | 0 | 6 | > > +--------------------------------+------------+------------+ > > Please disregard this patch. I posted v2 here: > > http://lkml.kernel.org/g/[email protected] > > (and I'm eager to see the kbuild/kernel test robot results ;)) I don't see how the v1->v2 changes could fix a panic?
