On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 04:20:56PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/kmemleak.h b/include/linux/kmemleak.h
> index 4894c6888bc6..380f72bc3657 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kmemleak.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kmemleak.h
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
> #ifndef __KMEMLEAK_H
> #define __KMEMLEAK_H
>
> +#include <linux/mm.h>
Given the kbuild-robot reports, this #include doesn't go well on some
architectures.
> #include <linux/slab.h>
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK
> @@ -109,4 +110,29 @@ static inline void kmemleak_no_scan(const void *ptr)
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK */
>
> +static inline void kmemleak_alloc_phys(phys_addr_t phys, size_t size,
> + int min_count, gfp_t gfp)
> +{
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HIGHMEM) || phys < __pa(high_memory))
> + kmemleak_alloc(__va(phys), size, min_count, gfp);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void kmemleak_free_part_phys(phys_addr_t phys, size_t size)
> +{
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HIGHMEM) || phys < __pa(high_memory))
> + kmemleak_free_part(__va(phys), size);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void kmemleak_not_leak_phys(phys_addr_t phys)
> +{
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HIGHMEM) || phys < __pa(high_memory))
> + kmemleak_not_leak(__va(phys));
> +}
> +
> +static inline void kmemleak_ignore_phys(phys_addr_t phys)
> +{
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HIGHMEM) || phys < __pa(high_memory))
> + kmemleak_ignore(__va(phys));
> +}
I'll move these functions out of line and re-post the patch.
--
Catalin
