On 03/12/2016 04:38 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Use of a temporary R8 register here seems to be unnecessary.
>>
>> "push %r8" is a two-byte insn (it needs REX prefix to specify R8),
>> "push $0" is two-byte too. It seems just using the latter would be
>> no worse.
>>
>> Thus, code had an unnecessary "xorq %r8,%r8" insn.
>
> Neat!
>
>> It probably costs nothing in execution time here since we are probably
>> limited by store bandwidth at this point, but still.
>>
>> Run-tested under QEMU: 32-bit calls still work:
>>
>> / # ./test_syscall_vdso32
>
> Did you manage to test all 3 compat variants:
>
>> @@ -72,24 +72,23 @@ ENTRY(entry_SYSENTER_compat)
>> @@ -205,17 +204,16 @@ ENTRY(entry_SYSCALL_compat)
>> @@ -316,11 +314,10 @@ ENTRY(entry_INT80_compat)
Yes.
test_syscall_vdso32 checks vdso syscall (if available)
and direct int80 syscall.
Booting two times, with different qemu flags:
qemu-system-x86_64 -cpu Opteron_G4
qemu-system-x86_64 -cpu SandyBridge
makes kernel choose either SYSCALL or SYSENTER vdso.
So it's all covered.
