Rudolf Polzer <[email protected]> wrote:
> A small nit: could it be that the month_lengths array also exists elsewhere
> in the kernel? Can it possibly be shared? A quick glance around didn't pop
> up anything that's not static, so, looks like it's okay to add yet another
> one...
Fair point, but outside of the scope of this patch. The array already exists
that I'm fixing. It's definitely material for a future patch though.
Note that the following:
git grep 'month.*[[]'
trawls up a few candidates.
David
