On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 01:31:30PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 02:54:03PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu: > > Using FEATURE-INCLUDE in bpf subproject in case bpf is built > > via perf. Keep the current features detection for other cases. > > > > Cc: Wang Nan <[email protected]> > > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/[email protected] > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> > > Clashes with: > > d8ad6a15cc3a ("tools lib bpf: Don't do a feature check when cleaning") > > That has, at that point: > > +check_feat := 1 > +NON_CHECK_FEAT_TARGETS := clean TAGS tags cscope help > +ifdef MAKECMDGOALS > +ifeq ($(filter-out $(NON_CHECK_FEAT_TARGETS),$(MAKECMDGOALS)),) > + check_feat := 0 > +endif > +endif > + > +ifeq ($(check_feat),1) > include $(srctree)/tools/build/Makefile.feature > +endif > > On a related note: > > [acme@zoo linux]$ make O=/tmp/build/perf -C tools/perf > make: Entering directory '/home/git/linux/tools/perf' > BUILD: Doing 'make -j4' parallel build > make[2]: Nothing to be done for 'fixdep'. > make: Leaving directory '/home/git/linux/tools/perf' > > Can we get away with that "make[2]: Nothing to be done for 'fixdep'." > line?
I'll check on that jirka -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
