Hi Konrad,
On Thu Jul 17, 2025 at 11:46 AM CEST, Luca Weiss wrote:
> Hi Konrad,
>
> On Thu Jul 17, 2025 at 10:29 AM CEST, Luca Weiss wrote:
>> On Mon Jul 14, 2025 at 1:06 PM CEST, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> On 7/13/25 10:05 AM, Luca Weiss wrote:
>>>> Add a devicetree description for the Milos SoC, which is for example
>>>> Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (SM7635).
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.we...@fairphone.com>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>> +
>>>> + spmi_bus: spmi@c400000 {
>>>> + compatible = "qcom,spmi-pmic-arb";
>>>
>>> There's two bus instances on this platform, check out the x1e binding
>>
>> Will do
>
> One problem: If we make the labels spmi_bus0 and spmi_bus1 then we can't
> reuse the existing PMIC dtsi files since they all reference &spmi_bus.
>
> On FP6 everything's connected to PMIC_SPMI0_*, and PMIC_SPMI1_* is not
> connected to anything so just adding the label spmi_bus on spmi_bus0
> would be fine.
>
> Can I add this to the device dts? Not going to be pretty though...
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/milos-fairphone-fp6.dts
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/milos-fairphone-fp6.dts
> index d12eaa585b31..69605c9ed344 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/milos-fairphone-fp6.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/milos-fairphone-fp6.dts
> @@ -11,6 +11,9 @@
> #include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-gpio.h>
> #include <dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h>
> #include "milos.dtsi"
> +
> +spmi_bus: &spmi_bus0 {};
> +
> #include "pm7550.dtsi"
> #include "pm8550vs.dtsi"
> #include "pmiv0104.dtsi" /* PMIV0108 */
>
> Or I can add a second label for the spmi_bus0 as 'spmi_bus'. Not sure
> other designs than SM7635 recommend using spmi_bus1 for some stuff.
>
> But I guess longer term we'd need to figure out a solution to this, how
> to place a PMIC on a given SPMI bus, if reference designs start to
> recommend putting different PMIC on the separate busses.
Any feedback on this regarding the spmi_bus label?
Regards
Luca
>
> Regards
> Luca
