On Mon, 2021-02-01 at 09:35 -0500, Stefan Berger wrote: > On 2/1/21 8:23 AM, David Howells wrote: > > Stefan Berger <stef...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > >> From: Stefan Berger <stef...@linux.ibm.com> > >> > >> Detect whether a key is an sm2 type of key by its OID in the parameters > >> array rather than assuming that everything under OID_id_ecPublicKey > >> is sm2, which is not the case. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stef...@linux.ibm.com> > >> Cc: David Howells <dhowe...@redhat.com> > >> Cc: keyri...@vger.kernel.org > > I presume these cc's are intentionally not on the first patch or the cover > > (if > > there is one)? > > No, this is not intentional. I guess this is a case of wrong use of cc: > versus mailing lists - my bad. I posted the whole series to > linux-crypto, linux-integrity, keyrings and lkml. > > V6 is at least visible here now: > > - https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/1/31/323 > > - https://marc.info/?l=linux-crypto-vger&m=161213604618722&w=2 > > - > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20210131233301.1301787-1-stef...@linux.ibm.com/T/#mbc9fae5facb4178f64c1145e2654258c0af8fa96 > > - https://marc.info/?l=linux-keyrings&m=161213608818735&w=2 > > > > > > > Do you have a branch you want me to pull or did you want me to take just > > patches 2-4? > > Please take it from the mailing list. If there are requests for more > changes on the crypto level, I will send another series. I personally am > waiting for some sort of verdict on the crypto level...
The entire patch set should be upstreamed as a single patch set, after having each of the maintainer's Ack it. In addition, the v6 version is missing some Reviewed-by tags. (Stefan will re-post a v7 patch set.) David, I don't have problem with this patch set being upstreamed via the keys subsystem, assuming it's been tested. thanks, Mimi
