On 2/1/21 8:23 AM, David Howells wrote:
Stefan Berger <stef...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
From: Stefan Berger <stef...@linux.ibm.com>
Detect whether a key is an sm2 type of key by its OID in the parameters
array rather than assuming that everything under OID_id_ecPublicKey
is sm2, which is not the case.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stef...@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowe...@redhat.com>
Cc: keyri...@vger.kernel.org
I presume these cc's are intentionally not on the first patch or the cover (if
there is one)?
No, this is not intentional. I guess this is a case of wrong use of cc:
versus mailing lists - my bad. I posted the whole series to
linux-crypto, linux-integrity, keyrings and lkml.
V6 is at least visible here now:
- https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/1/31/323
- https://marc.info/?l=linux-crypto-vger&m=161213604618722&w=2
-
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20210131233301.1301787-1-stef...@linux.ibm.com/T/#mbc9fae5facb4178f64c1145e2654258c0af8fa96
- https://marc.info/?l=linux-keyrings&m=161213608818735&w=2
Do you have a branch you want me to pull or did you want me to take just
patches 2-4?
Please take it from the mailing list. If there are requests for more
changes on the crypto level, I will send another series. I personally am
waiting for some sort of verdict on the crypto level...
Stefan
