Am Freitag, 10. Juli 2015, 21:38:02 schrieb Herbert Xu:

Hi Herbert,

>On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 12:19:53PM +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote:
>> All GCM implementations available on recent Intel systems successfully
>> tested (i.e NX and CAAM not tested).
>> 
>> Just to clarify: from a caller's perspective, using
>> seqniv(rfc4106(gcm(aes))) is still the right invocation? Or shall I now
>> use seqiv?
>
>You should use seqiv from now on.  But I should update the patches
>so that seqniv is not visible to user-space.

In this case, wouldn't xfrm_algo.c need to be changed too?
>
>Cheers,


Ciao
Stephan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to