Am Freitag, 10. Juli 2015, 21:38:02 schrieb Herbert Xu: Hi Herbert,
>On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 12:19:53PM +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote: >> All GCM implementations available on recent Intel systems successfully >> tested (i.e NX and CAAM not tested). >> >> Just to clarify: from a caller's perspective, using >> seqniv(rfc4106(gcm(aes))) is still the right invocation? Or shall I now >> use seqiv? > >You should use seqiv from now on. But I should update the patches >so that seqniv is not visible to user-space. In this case, wouldn't xfrm_algo.c need to be changed too? > >Cheers, Ciao Stephan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
