On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 12:19:53PM +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote: > > All GCM implementations available on recent Intel systems successfully tested > (i.e NX and CAAM not tested). > > Just to clarify: from a caller's perspective, using seqniv(rfc4106(gcm(aes))) > is still the right invocation? Or shall I now use seqiv?
You should use seqiv from now on. But I should update the patches so that seqniv is not visible to user-space. Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu <herb...@gondor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
