On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 12:19:53PM +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote:
>
> All GCM implementations available on recent Intel systems successfully tested 
> (i.e NX and CAAM not tested).
> 
> Just to clarify: from a caller's perspective, using seqniv(rfc4106(gcm(aes))) 
> is still the right invocation? Or shall I now use seqiv?

You should use seqiv from now on.  But I should update the patches
so that seqniv is not visible to user-space.

Cheers,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herb...@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to