On Sat, 3 May 2014 06:44:39 -0500 Garg Vakul-B16394 <va...@freescale.com> wrote:
> > From: Kim Phillips [mailto:kim.phill...@freescale.com] > > Sent: Saturday, May 03, 2014 5:40 AM > > > > On Sun, 27 Apr 2014 11:26:14 -0400 > > Vakul Garg <va...@freescale.com> wrote: > > > > > @@ -220,6 +220,8 @@ static int aead_null_set_sh_desc(struct crypto_aead > > *aead) > > > if (DESC_AEAD_NULL_ENC_LEN + DESC_JOB_IO_LEN + > > > ctx->split_key_pad_len <= CAAM_DESC_BYTES_MAX) > > > keys_fit_inline = true; > > > + else > > > + keys_fit_inline = false; > > > > Can we do the easier to read: > > > > keys_fit_inline = false; > > if (DESC_AEAD_NULL_ENC_LEN + DESC_JOB_IO_LEN + > > ctx->split_key_pad_len <= CAAM_DESC_BYTES_MAX) > > keys_fit_inline = true; > > > > ? > > Why pre-init a variable with default value when it could be overwritten? why not? compiler output doesn't differ in this regard. > I think that the form I submitted is equally easy to read. adding one line instead of two -> less lines overall -> more code on one screen -> easier to read. Kim -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
