On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 14:32 +0000, David Howells wrote:
> Serge Hallyn <serge.hal...@canonical.com> wrote:
> 
> > > +int tpm_send(u32 chip_num, void *cmd, size_t buflen)
> > 
> > Hate to nit-pick, but any particular reason you're not following the
> > rest of the file and using 'struct tpm_cmd_t *cmd' here?
> 
> Ummm...  Something else I've just noticed...
> 
>       static ssize_t tpm_transmit(struct tpm_chip *chip, const char *buf,
>                                              size_t bufsiz)
> 
> would suggest that buf is read-only, but tpm_transit() keeps casting it away,
> and especially, casts it away before passing it to chip->vendor.recv()...
> This would seem to indicate a logic error somewhere.
> 
> Certainly, tpm_atml_recv() modifies the buffer it is given to...

as does tpm_tis_recv(). By the TCG spec, the return data should go in the
same input buffer.

> I suspect the argument and reply buffer pointers should be passed separately.

It seems more like a spurious "const" in tpm_transmit(). This has been in the
code for a long time. Good catch. I'll draft a cleanup for these and some
other nits and send to Rajiv...

thanks!
dave

> David
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to