----- "Neil Horman" <nhor...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 03:10:12PM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > > Can you ennumerate here what FIPS and Common Criteria mandate be presented
> > > in the audit logs?
> >
> > Who did what to whom at what time and what was the outcome. In the case of
> > configuration changes we need the new and old values. However, we need
> > extra
> > information to make the selective audit work right.
> >
> Somehow I doubt that FIPS mandates that audit messages include "who did what
> to
> whoom and what the result was" :).
Actually, that's about right for CC :)
> The TSF shall record within each audit record at least the following
> information:
> a) Date and time of the event, type of event, subject identity (if
> applicable), and the outcome (success or failure) of the event;
and, for specific operations, e.g.:
> Minimal level: Success and failure, and the type of cryptographic operation
> Basic level: Any applicable cryptographic mode(s) of operation, subject
> attributes and object attributes
Now what exactly is "subject/object identity" and "subject/object attributes"
is the important question that's defined elsewhere, and I don't know enough
about these aspects.
Mirek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
