Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Frank Seidel wrote: > Wel... > > Using kmalloc() increases code size, makes the code more complex, and > increases > the risk of introducing a memory leak now or later.
Ok, admitted. >> I just stumbled over tcrypt on the make checkstack output and as also >> the kerneljanitors todo advises to reduce this footprint where possible >> i just wanted to help out here. > > Reducing stack usage is fine. However, for a loadable test module without > concurrency issues it's far easier to do that by just making the data static. Is PATCHv3 then ok for you? Thanks, Frank -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
