On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 05:17:51PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > By the way, the commit that I believe introduced this regression did two > or three different things at once--I spent some time staring at it and > can't say I really understand the change. That's probably just me! But > would it be possible to split up these patches fine enough that people > inexperienced with this code would have a better chance of understanding > what's going on?
Good point, I'll make sure they're more granular in future. > (And did the crypto testing module use to have some tests for buffers > that were fragmented in odd ways, or was I imagining that? I'd be happy > to help come up with some test cases if it'd be useful.) It does test fragments but it doesn't do it in the way you suggested. In particular, the fragments probably won't be starting off at a page boundary. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
