On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 10:16:14AM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 04:16:56PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > Thanks for the patch.  However I still have a question as to why
> > this is happening.
> > 
> > As far as I can see scatterwalk_copychunks is only called in two
> > places.  In both spots it only processes one block of data.  Since
> > we set the maximum block size to PAGE_SIZE/8 I don't see how you
> > can get an offset of zero and still roll over to the next page
> > in scatterwalk_copychunks.
> 
> Are the elements of the scatterlists assumed to always be full pages?  I
> need to encrypt things that look like, for example:
> 
>       sg[0].page = page1
>       sg[0].offset = 0
>       sg[0].length = 5
>       sg[1].page = page2
>       sg[1].offset = 0
>       sg[1].length = 37

(Erm, second should be 27--I did mean this to come out to a multiple of
8....)--b.

> 
> and worse....  I could do this by hand if I had to, but the crypto code,
> if it's not designed to handle this sort of thing, seems very close, so
> I'd rather enhance it than duplicate a lot of this complicated
> scatterlist-traversal stuff.
> 
> --b.
> _______________________________________________
> NFSv4 mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://linux-nfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to