On 4 January 2012 15:09, Richard Sandiford <richard.sandif...@linaro.org> wrote: > Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana.radhakrish...@linaro.org> writes: >> On 29 December 2011 10:21, Richard Sandiford >> <richard.sandif...@linaro.org> wrote: >>> The remaining change for neon-strided-load-extract is to allow fwprop.c >>> to propagate: >>> >>> (set (reg X) (subreg (reg Y) N)) >>> >>> even if no further simplifications are possible. I posted the original >>> patch for comments here: >>> >>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gcc.patches/246180/ >>> >>> and fixed the problem that H.J. spotted. I wasn't entirely happy with >>> the benchmark results though, so it never became an RFA. >> >> When you say you weren't happy with the benchmark results - would you >> remember if it didn't show >> any significant improvements or were there significant regressions ? > > There were some nice improvements but a couple of regressions. I don't > remember the regressions being very big, but they were outside the noise, > so I wanted to explain them first.
Ok - thanks that's good enough to know. Ramana > > Richard _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
