Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana.radhakrish...@linaro.org> writes: > On 29 December 2011 10:21, Richard Sandiford > <richard.sandif...@linaro.org> wrote: >> The remaining change for neon-strided-load-extract is to allow fwprop.c >> to propagate: >> >> (set (reg X) (subreg (reg Y) N)) >> >> even if no further simplifications are possible. I posted the original >> patch for comments here: >> >> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gcc.patches/246180/ >> >> and fixed the problem that H.J. spotted. I wasn't entirely happy with >> the benchmark results though, so it never became an RFA. > > When you say you weren't happy with the benchmark results - would you > remember if it didn't show > any significant improvements or were there significant regressions ?
There were some nice improvements but a couple of regressions. I don't remember the regressions being very big, but they were outside the noise, so I wanted to explain them first. Richard _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
