2012/7/9 ykzhao <[email protected]>: > On Sun, 2012-07-08 at 22:28 -0600, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote: >> > There is no problem when the variable of dri_state is renamed to >> > drm_state. >> > But it seems a little confusing as the patch 2 already defines the >> > structure type of drm_state. >> >> Both patches could be merged altogether, if this is what you suggest. > > No. What I mean is that the name seems a little confusing. And the > readability of ctx->drm_state is decreased as the patch 2 defines the > data structure of drm_state.
What are you really talking about? And what's your suggestion then? _______________________________________________ Libva mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libva
