On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 23:44 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> the goal is also to get rid of BOOL, but again being careful with uno
> interaction: if uno -> sal_Bool otherwise bool
> (this is particularly tricky when touching the prototype of a virtual
> function... as all of the derived virtual of a given function must be
> change at once)
Ah - indeed; I am hoping that Peter's new gcc analytics work will be
able to find instances where we got this wrong with virtual methods and
warn us. Peter - prolly another good thing to look at catching
initially.
HTH,
Michael.
--
[email protected] <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
