2011/7/26 Marc-André Laverdière <[email protected]>: > This patch is bringing up a small question: > > I thought we were trying to standardize the code to use sal_* types > everywhere... > > Can anyone confirm/deny that? >
No, not exactly. it is actually the intention to use bool/true/false unless that break the UNO API (and for 4.0 we will make sure that UNO API do suport the native bool type, so that sal_Bool will be indeed strictly equal to bool) the goal is also to get rid of BOOL, but again being careful with uno interaction: if uno -> sal_Bool otherwise bool (this is particularly tricky when touching the prototype of a virtual function... as all of the derived virtual of a given function must be change at once) Norbert _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
