On 02/12/10 23:07, Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 10:32:15PM +0000, Wols Lists wrote: >> I would agree with this. This is my problem with ant - I have java but >> not ant installed, it worked for me on the old system, and it now fails. > Then install it?
That's what I may well do. But imho it's rather stupid to have ant as a specific install in my world file, and not java. Spock: "it does not compute" And as others have said, we want the build system to be newbie-friendly. It always *used* to download its own ant, so it's a regression. A lot of systems will have java runtime installed. It shouldn't assume that just because the runtime is there, the development setup is also there. (And imho it shouldn't force developers to install the development system system-wide either - as I said why should ant be an explicit install when java isn't?) > Grüße/Regards, > > René Cheers, Wol _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
