On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 05:45:17PM +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > >> (without the bogus version dependencies), quicker to compile, and faster > >> to run (I hope) ;-) > > Faste to run? Surely not. Java is only loaded when java-stuff is actually > used.
Actually observations show it does make a difference. > > >> It might also help us address some of the nasties on Windows - > >> where we > >> cannot easily ship a JRE everywhere. > > Don't mix runtime with buildtime please... > If you're suggesting to also disable java for the released builds, > then I scream even louder. ACK. And I don't think people - even if they built themselves - should get a build in which some stuff ON PURPOSE does not work. > >> [...] > >> You have a day to scream 'STOP', 'LOOK', 'LISTEN' :-) failing that > >> I > >> suggest we tweak the default tomorrow. > > The /defaults/ should be as close to what the shipped product will use. ACK. ((Though --without-java in some way would help to test the chronically untested --without-java build) > If you want to not break when no JDK is installed, then go ahead and > turn it into a warning "No JDK found, java support will be disabled" > or similar, but please don't switch the default around. I disagree. Default should stay as-is, as much as one might dislike Java and/or the Java dependeny. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [email protected] | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
