Pedro píše v Pá 07. 12. 2012 v 04:42 -0800: > Hi Michael > > > Michael Meeks-2 wrote > >> BTW the build organization improved a lot. Well done! > > > > So you're generally happy with the change ? [ it'd be nice to avoid the > > back-compat symlinks if that works for everyone since they'd clutter the > > top-level with two inter-mingled un-related concepts: branch and > > build-system if possible ]. > > I am very happy with that particular change. Actually if someone asked QA > people I think that it could be improved. As Rainer suggested in the Website > topic, it could have two paths 1) daily\by_OS\by_branch and 2) > daily\by_branch\by_OS > > TBH the previous organization by machine was really the worst :)
OK, you say that daily\by_OS\by_branch is the worst solution. Would anyone use it at all when we have daily\by_branch\by_OS now? Would it be really improvement if we need to maintain two trees and bunch of compat symlinks? Was the change really so controversial that I needed to ask for approval all people around? I agree that it would have been better to add QA mailing list into CC but there was reason (time press) as explained. Note that I announced it and explained, so you were informed. Best Regards, Petr _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
