Hi Pedro,
On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 08:11 -0800, Pedro wrote:
> You (whoever did this)
Actually, I've no idea who did this :-) we should find out, perhaps
Norbert knows.
> could have done exactly the same while showing some consideration for the
> few people who still bother with QA and announcing the changes here first.
Agreed.
> Apologies are nice but avoiding having to apologize is much better...
Agreed again :-)
> BTW the build organization improved a lot. Well done!
So you're generally happy with the change ? [ it'd be nice to avoid the
back-compat symlinks if that works for everyone since they'd clutter the
top-level with two inter-mingled un-related concepts: branch and
build-system if possible ].
> Florian Effenberger wrote
> > I think this is rather a question for the developers, since that machine
> > is maintained by them and I don't want to interfere with their way of
> > working. :-)
>
> Yep. This is only a question for developers. Just ignore people who can't
> code.
I'm sorry you feel that way: for me developers includes people doing
the critical job of QA; I'd use 'hackers' for people doing the coding -
not sure what Florian means.
So - I'm sorry this was not discussed in advance here; Norbert - do you
know off hand more about the story there ?
All the best,
Michael.
--
[email protected] <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [email protected]
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
