Hi Pedro,
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 08:20 -0800, Pedro wrote:
> Almost a year ago I tried to prove to the devs that the daily build naming
> scheme is useless for QA people.
:-)
> (and yes, I know I said it was my final request back then...)
Heh.
> One year later, after installing (at least under Windows) there is still no
> way to know if build
> Version 4.0.0.0.alpha1+ (Build ID: 6aabe09ac092c51d4b394bde9c7ea0055b952e3)
> was installed from
> master~2012-11-26_00.29.34_LibO-Dev_4.0.0.0.alpha1_Win_x86_install_en-US.msi
> or from which Tinderbox it came from.
You want to know the host it was built on ? sounds like a reasonable
request to me - though it's somewhat unclear how that should be
configured / propagated from machine to machine.
Should be an easy enough hack if someone wants to do it I guess
auto-detecting the node-name is prolly a bit nasty; but passing
something in via configure / tinbuild2 is presumably quite do-able ?
Anyone want to hack it up ?
Thanks,
Michael.
--
[email protected] <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [email protected]
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
