Hi all Almost a year ago I tried to prove to the devs that the daily build naming scheme is useless for QA people.
(and yes, I know I said it was my final request back then...) At the time *Lionel* proposed an epoch based naming scheme and *Björn* mentioned a better solution http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Naming-builds-Please-td3556898i20.html#a3567211 One year later, after installing (at least under Windows) there is still no way to know if build Version 4.0.0.0.alpha1+ (Build ID: 6aabe09ac092c51d4b394bde9c7ea0055b952e3) was installed from master~2012-11-26_00.29.34_LibO-Dev_4.0.0.0.alpha1_Win_x86_install_en-US.msi or from which Tinderbox it came from. Any chance of improving this? Best, Pedro -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Master-builds-name-revisited-tp4021041.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
