On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 21:19 +0200, Nino Novak wrote:
> > To cut it short, we came to the conclusion, that a Bug
>> Submission API (BS-API) would be very helpful.
>
> Could you elaborate a little the "why?"?
Heh - it sounds like a nice way to report bugs to me. Of course, it
also sounds like it would need a built-in bug reporting assistant inside
LibreOffice - which would be quite some coding work.
> (Apart from the skepticism above, I'm very much in favour of making bug
> reporting easy, of course.)
Yep :-) IMHO we have still quite a long way to go to improve the web
bugzilla assistant that can capture a lot of this goodness. In
particular, I'd love to have questions about whether it worked in old
versions in there - so we can auto-generate the "regression" keyword;
internationalise that better, add more details on binary chopping down
documents, and so on. And the biggest blocker there is openID
integration of course - we should poke Tollef about progress there.
So - in general, I'd love to improve what we have there - though the
web doesn't provide the ideal interface for easily building beautiful
bug reports IMHO ;-) eg. the useful screenshotting functionality is
rather tough there AFAIK.
ATB,
Michael.
--
[email protected] <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [email protected]
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/